Deonvelt Miller is a 16-year-old sophomore (10th-grader), who attends Maplewood High School. Deonvelt Miller and Lateze Robinson have both confessed to the armed, attempted carjacking and the killing of Eric Scott Mansfield, and to a separate carjacking in east Nashville that took place minutes afterward. Miller was arrested on December 7, 2005, without incident at his 2160 Rock-City-Street home and charged at Juvenile Court with criminal homicide, aggravated robbery and two counts of unlawful weapon possession. Investigators regarded him as a suspect early on, but it was a tip called into Crime Stoppers that led to his arrest, police said. Miller’s detention hearing was held at 2:30 p.m. Friday, December 9, 2005.

After Deonvelt Miller's detention hearing, three of his former basketball coaches spoke outside the Juvenile Justice Center about the teen's rising athletic star and how he had shown no signs of problems while traveling and playing. "We've supported Deonvelt Miller since he was a young child," said Ed Wisdom "We're here again to support him. Certainly, we don't want to ignore the tragic incident of Eric Mansfield losing his life. We sympathize with his family and his friends."
 

The Following Media Release was made by the Metro Nashville Police Department

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 7, 2005
 

A tip to Crime Stoppers ultimately led to today’s arrest of the gunman who killed Warner Brothers Records employee Eric Mansfield in East Nashville on the night of November 11.
Deonvelt Miller, 16, a 10th grader at Maplewood High School, was arrested without incident at his 2160 Rock City Street home. He is charged at Juvenile Court with criminal homicide, aggravated robbery and two counts of unlawful weapon possession. Miller’s detention hearing is set for 2:30 p.m. Friday.

Mansfield, 33, Warner Brothers Records’ Director of Creative Services, was fatally wounded while behind the wheel of his silver Volkswagen Jetta at the intersection of Chapel and Greenwood Avenues, not far from his home.

In his statement to detectives, Miller said that he intended to rob Mansfield and take his car. Miller said that when Mansfield stopped at the intersection, he walked into the street in front of the Volkswagen with pistol in hand. Miller said Mansfield accelerated in an effort to get away. Miller fired a shot. Mansfield drove a short distance before pulling to the side of Chapel Avenue between Douglas and McKennie Avenues. He was found unresponsive by his housemate at 7:25 p.m. on November 11.

(more - see article)

See original articles

If these links do not work, do a news search for "Eric Scott Mansfield Deonvelt Miller"

http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051210/NEWS03/512100353/1017/NEWS

http://www.police.nashville.org/news/media/2005/12/07a.htm

http://www.outinamerica.com/home/news.asp?articleid=10302

http://www.newschannel5.com/content/news/16132.asp

http://www.outinknoxville.com/home/news.asp?articleid=10339

It comes, of course, as no surprise to us that this story has not been covered at all by the national media. And why hasn't the murder of a homosexual man not even been mentioned by the national media? Fires, bus accidents with no fatalities, dam breaks, rivers overflowing their banks - all of these stories are covered by the national media. But the murder of a highly-respected, Warner-Brothers'-Records executive, in the country's music capital, Nashville, Tennessee, is just ignored. How can this be explained?

The reason is most probably because, although no one knew for sure that the perpetrators were Black males, since they were not apprehended until about four weeks after the crime, it was almost a sure bet that they were. Why?  Quite simply, because the neighborhood where the killing took place is mostly Black. And, a few minutes after Eric Mansfield's murder, a few blocks away, a carjacking took place at gunpoint, and the perpetrators were two Black males. That these crimes were connected was presumed by the police. So, in light of the fact that the killers were more than likely Blacks, the politically-correct national media, which is committed to playing down the extent of Black crime, totally suppressed the story. One might say that the decision makers of the national media played the odds and won; if the killers eventually had proven to be White, then, they could still have published the story.

The murder was, of course, covered by the local, mainstream media in the Nashville, Tennessee, area. And, because the victim was a homosexual, and White, two alternative national organizations covered the story - the first is a homosexual publication called "Out in America Newspaper," (outinamerica.com) and the second is a White rights' organization called "newnation.org." We discovered the story on newnation.org. This is another example of a story that we would not have found out about, were it not for someone in the Nashville, Tennessee, area, informing the staff at the White rights' organization, newnation.org about this murder.

It is of interest to note how the local media and the homosexual newspaper reported this story. Directly after the murder, and up until the time the first suspect was apprehended, the local media ran only a few articles attesting to the facts of the situation, i.e., man murdered, found in car, place of employment, found by roommate, reward, etc. They did not, however, identify the victim as a gay or a homosexual. The reader had to infer this from the use of the words "partner" and "roommate." David Miller (no relation to Deonvelt Miller), Eric Mansfield's homosexual partner, was referred to as Eric Mansfield's "partner" or his "roommate." The homosexual newspaper, on the other hand, featured the fact that the victim was a homosexual; he was referred to as a "gay."

After the first perpetrator was arrested, the Nashville police department published a story on their website about the arrest and, although they didn't mention the fact that the perpetrator was a Black male, they published the police mug shot. It should be noted here that the police website is another example of an alternative media source. This is something new; before the advent of the Internet and police websites, the public had to depend on the mainstream media for information about the race of the perpetrator, and, needless to say, the mainstream media was not too dependable, in this regard. Whereas the establishment media, whether local or national, are now forced to follow PC guidelines, which often means no photos and no disclosure of the suspect's race, the police, although I am certain that they also have some restrictions, are still allowed to at least publish the mug shot of the individual arrested. This mug shot was then used by the local media, and newnation.org, but not by the homosexual publication.

Readers judge articles both by what they say, and by what they don't say. The homosexual publication described the first-arrested perpetrator, Deonvelt Miller, merely as a "teenager;" but they didn't mention the fact that he is Black and, as stated, they did not publish a photograph, although the police mug shot was available. Nor did they mention the fact that Deonvelt Miller had an accomplice, and that the accomplice was still at large. Additionally, the homosexual publication wrote the following: "Metro Police have said that the motive in the murder was robbery and that Mansfield was a random victim." After the first suspect was arrested and confessed to the killing, it was quite clear that the motive was robbery and that it was a random killing. The point to be made here is that the homosexual newspaper very cautiously does not go beyond the stating of obvious facts. They dare not elaborate lest they breach the bounds of political correctness.

The "Out in America Newspaper," as a homosexual publication, is an advocacy publication, and it reflects the biases of the homosexual community. But, other than promoting their own homosexual agenda, the homosexual editorial staff is forced to be mindful of the dictates of political correctness, since homosexuals (just like Blacks, Hispanics, lesbians, Arabs, Jews, Asians, etc.) are also protected by the political correctness guidelines. This means that, in this case, in which a homosexual was killed by two Black males, the homosexuals cannot be properly critical of the Black males, and they cannot expand their criticism of them onto the Black community. In other words their hands are tied; they cannot be objective in their reporting of this case, because they have to mind their place as a member of the larger group of "protected minorities and protected lifestyles."

By mentioning that "robbery" was the motive of this attempted carjacking and killing, since Deonvelt Miller stated that he needed money, the reader's attention is diverted from the murdered victim to the underprivileged African American youth, who, after all, needed money. And, when the reporter mentions that the police said that Eric Mansfield was a "random" victim, he (the reporter) is attempting to lessen the severity of this type of murder, since the word "random" connotes a sense of chance or absence of planning, which can be construed to mean that they were really not specifically targeting Eric Mansfield and they really didn't have anything against him. This choosiness of words is all part and parcel of the subterfuge being employed by the advocates of political correctness as they attempt to manipulate our perspective of reality.

Having said that, how would we, the management of this website - White males, who admittedly have our own perspective - report this crime? As the reader knows, we are very concerned about the extent of Black and other non-White crime committed against Whites. The fact that Eric Mansfield was a homosexual has no bearing on our views concerning the random murder of White people or, for that matter, the people of other races. The killers did not know that Eric Mansfield was a homosexual; they did not kill him because he was a homosexual; they killed him because they thought that he had money. They could have killed any one of thousands of people who live or work in east Nashville, many of whom are White. The police reported this crime as a random killing. But was the killing completely random? Just why did they choose Eric Mansfield?

During his interrogation with Detective William Stewart, the killer stated that the driver of a Volkswagen Jetta approached with a nice, clean car, looking like somebody who might have some money. What the killer didn't tell detective Stewart, or, if he did, what detective Stewart didn't tell us, is that the killers could not only plainly see that Eric Mansfield was well-dressed, that he was driving a late-model, clean car, but that they could also plainly see that Eric Mansfield was White. They admittedly selected this White man, because he looked like he had money.  So, was this a completely random killing? We don't think so.

We think that he was selected because he was White? And for that reason this killing qualifies as a "hate crime." But the words "hate crime" were never uttered by the local media or the homosexual newspaper, and it is most likely that this website alone correctly sees this crime as a "hate crime" by Black males against a White man. And, because this crime clearly falls into the category of hate crimes, this is likely another reason why the national media ignored this story - they did not want to publicize a killing in which two Black Males killed a White man, because he was White and likely had money. The establishment media did not want to take the chance of having to discuss the possibility that this crime was a "hate crime."

But, setting aside the discussion as to whether or not this was a random killing of a White, or a general random killing, just what is a random killing? This question has never been addressed? The words "random victim," as used so often by the media, ring somewhat hollow. The media and public officials, both of whom are fully indoctrinated concerning the dictates of "political correctness," use terminology that is designed to placate the general public - such terms as "isolated incident" and "random victim".

Such terms are intended to render harmless the horrible crime that has occurred; they want us to feel as though we have nothing more to worry about, since the incident was just "isolated" or "random." Although it is a tragedy (they will tell us), that someone was killed, we'll see to it that they get a proper burial, and then we can all have closure and get on with our lives. The "PC powers that be" want to placate us and have us forget, as soon as possible, the horrible murder that has been committed.

Terms such as "isolated incident" and "random victim" have been used so many times by the media that they have almost lost their meaning. And, it's not only that these words have lost their meaning, the general public has lost its capacity for realistic perception, that is to say:  people are no longer capable of thinking straight, and, they have also lost their capacity to react. One might well say that the White population has become numb or paralyzed. We are not only being terrorized by the criminals - we are also being indoctrinated, controlled, manipulated, and deceived by the media.

At this point, allow me to give you our understanding of what a random killing actually is: A random killing is an act of terror - the members of the Irish Republican Army (IRA), The Basque separatist group in Spain (ETA), and the Palestinian Hamas organization, who kill people, either as suicide bombers or bomb planters, are random killers - they are terrorists. The suicide bombers in Iraq are random killers, and they are also classified as terrorists. Let us not delude ourselves and let us not allow the manipulative news media to mislead us.

We must recognize random killings for what they are - they are cold-blooded acts of terrorism. A carjacking is an act of random terror that often involves murder. Although it goes without saying, that all murders are serious crimes, random, terrorist killings are actually the most serious, because they affect more people than a murder in which the killer and the victim know each other. When random, terrorist killers are on the loose, whole neighborhoods and cities live in fear and terror, because they don't know who could be next.

And the terror does not subside when the perpetrators of a single act of random terror, such as the Wichita massacre or this one, are apprehended. Because the terror that we are being subjected to is not being exercised by just one person or a handful of people; there isn't just one potential terrorist killer, there is a whole element of society that is capable of random killing. And many people are coming to realize that this element is made up to a great extent of Black males. And it is not just conservative White people, who have come to this realization. African Americans also suffer greatly from the acts of Black random terrorists in their own neighborhoods. Many White liberals also fall victim to Black random terrorists. Homosexuals are known to be quite liberal, and here we have a case of a homosexual, Eric Mansfield, who was randomly killed by Black male terrorists. So, no one is safe.

Yours Faithfully, Liberty